Showing posts with label ART Banks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ART Banks. Show all posts

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

LETTER TO HON. UNION MINISTER OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.

To



Shri. Jagat Prasad Naddaji

Hon’ble Union Minister of Health and Family Welfare

New Delhi





RE: Letter dated 27/10/2015 issued by Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) for restricting the treatment of foreign nationals for surrogacy.



Sir,



The undersigned are the office of bearers of the society registered under the name and style of INSTAR. The society comprises for various IVF specialist Doctors, lawyers and ART banks (representative of surrogates). The doctors of the society have received a letter dated 27/10/2015 from ICMR bearing No. 5/10/8/2008-RHN late in the evening to convey the information as per the stand of the Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, that foreigners shall not be entertained for availing surrogacy services in India. The letter is served through email under the signatures of Dr. R.S Sharma.



Sir, with due respect, it came as utter shock and surprise not only to the entire medical fraternity working in this field but is against the spirit of democracy and rule of law. In our due submission, it is pertinent to mention that the ART Bill, 2014 draft is still in consultative stage as the same was made public on 30th September, 2015 and the general public as well the stake holders are given a period of 45 days to make their comments / objections and suggestions (if any). The said time frame has not got over and the BILL is yet to be presented and passed in the Parliament.

It is further submitted that there is a PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) pending before the Supreme Court of India bearing no. 95/2015 and titled as ‘Jay Shree Wad Versus Union of India’ wherein the Supreme Court after hearing the petitioner sought certain explanations from Union of India through Solicitor General of India and asked to revert back with reply/explanation of Union of India on 28th October, 2015. And an evening before the said date of 28th October, 2015 the doctors get the letter from ICMR about the decisions taken already about matters in the proposed ART BILL.



Further, the Supreme Court of India was in a state of awe to know that the decisions are already taken in a matter that is sub- judice and sought affidavit (s) from competent authorities . The process of to make law on the Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) has got defeated. If the outcome is already decided,  what is the purpose of seeking comments from public. It has made democracy a mockery where it means that no matter what the patients and people of India and patients  may say and feel , the outcome is pre determined. Democracy of India is For the people, of the people and by the people and our law making processes are established. Interference in the matter which is sub-judice losses the faith in the good governance of the country.



Also, to mention to the Hon’ble Minister that before the Supreme Court would know, the media knows it all. Even the doctors were not aware but media knew word by word as to what was decided by the Government of India.



Sir, family is the primary unit of society. This matter directly effects each and every individual in one way or the other. Such, a matter certainly cannot be pre decided when the BILL is already in progress and the Honourable Supreme Court has taken a note of the matter.



Sir, there are also matter pertaining to the ambiguity of the letter and the status of the communication in the light that Supreme Court refused to take on record any such decision till the affidavits are filed and it is not examined. The next date of hearing before  the Hon’ble Supreme Court  is 24th November, 2015.



Sir, we request your esteemed office to look into the matter and to kindly take the necessary steps for corrective measures so that there is no interference in the process of law making process of the  Parliament of India.


 With Regards
TEAM INSTAR 

Monday, 21 April 2014

INSTAR: Preliminary findings from the survey for consensus statement for Egg Donation in India


One of the most important tasks to be confirmed at the INSTAR workshop held on the 20th of April, was work towards a consensus statement on Egg Donation in India. This will  match previous work done by INSTAR  on the minimum agreed upon standards for  all surrogates across India.

Please see our Preliminary results below:

Dr. Himanshu Bavishi introducing the Workshop

 Findings from the first Survey for Consensus Statement on Egg Donation: INSTAR Scientific Consensus Committee –

Participants 60 - Prominent ART / IVF Specialists of India, ART Banks, Hon Supreme Court of India Advocates, psychological Counsellors

1.   What should be the minimum compensation for egg donors in India (instead of commercial the term compensated is used -- many countries who do commercial even use the term altruistic as it is compensating for time and effort and loss of wages and not commercial)

Answer-90% between 20 to 25k and 5%>25k and 5%>30k


2. Should there be an upper limit for financial compensation (an upper limit is so that this is not luring/ enticing egg donors but only compensating)

Answer-50% yes

50% no

2.   Contracts should be in Local Language along with English :

Answer-100% agree

4. Egg sharing from a donor should not decide the dose of medications as donor health and safety are primary concerns: Agree/ Disagree

Answer-100% agree

5. Realistic expectations for number of eggs collected from donor should be given to Intended parents (can be based on antral follicle count scan)and efforts should be made to avoid complications like Hyperstimulation:   Agree/ Disagree

Answer-100% agree

6. List of potential complications should be discussed with the egg donor in Local Language as well as English consent forms:: Agree/ Disagree

Answer-100% agree

7. Who will be responsible for managing any extra care if required after the donation process 
Intended parents 
IVF clinic who did the stimulation or egg collection
ART Bank

Answer-33.3%-intended parents
30%% ivf clinic
36.6%ART bank

8. Screening tests for egg donors as in form from ICMR Website  M2 of the egg donation

Answer 95% agree as per ICMR
5% agree but want Additional  tests as well

9. Egg donor to be compensated fully if the egg collection process is done irrespective of number of eggs collected or quality of eggs or no eggs

Answer- 95% agree irrespective

5% say that if donor has not disclosed history of substance abuse then their compensation must be reduced

10. A form should be filled by the donor stating that she has not donated more than 6 times as per ICMR Rule:: Agree/ Disagree

Answer-100%  agree

11. A gap of at least 3 months should be kept between two egg donations

Answer-50%2 months
33.3% for 3 months
16.33% between 2 to 3 months

12. All centres should have vigilant post operative care as per ICMR and prevailing authority rules

Answer-100% yes

13. Donor anonymity to be maintained strictly.

Answer-100% yes.